present at the time of inspection.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises ... confirmed
in which accused was acquitted as company failed to procure the
documents of occupancy / ownership. So, the assertion
actual registered consumer of the premises.
They did not procure any documents pertaining to the
ownership / occupancy on record. No inquiry on the aspect ... Page 8/14
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry in this
could not tell the pole number.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises ... confirmed
in which accused was acquitted as company failed to procure the
documents of occupancy / ownership. So, the assertion of the
witness that accused
reported to the local police.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry ... Guddu in which accused was acquitted as company
failed to procure the documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
ownership / tenancy documents
before or after the raid. Team has not procured any documents
regarding the ownership of the premises. Public persons were not
made ... prove their case against the accused.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises
BYPL Vs. Vimla
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry in this ... confirmed
in which accused was acquitted as company failed to procure the
documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
documents at
the site. Team / department had not checked the ownership / tenancy
documents before or after the raid. Team has not procured any
documents regarding ... prove
their case against the accused.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises
reported to the local police.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry ... Guddu in which accused was acquitted as company
failed to procure the documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
occupancy of accused by positive evidence.
10. The company did not procure the documents pertaining to
occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises ... Guddu in which accused was acquitted as company failed to
procure the documents of occupancy / ownership.
11. The company was under obligation to prove
reported to the
local police.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry ... Guddu in which accused was acquitted as company
failed to procure the documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
