assessee to his Advocate. It was the main assessee, who had procured the
documents from the concerned authorities and claimed the refund. Not only
that ... indeed could not legally be held liable for
criminal prosecution for procuring the documents by main assessee in order
to attract the penal provisions
agricultural land in question but after taking the
illegal benefits of procured police report, they also filed their baseless
claims through their attorney after forging ... file destroyed / misplaced. After a long gap of 8
months, upon procured documents of the respondents No.2 to 4, a file
was reconstructed
accused was mentioned in the reports.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises ... confirmed
in which accused was acquitted as company failed to procure the
documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
documents at
the site. Team / department had not checked the ownership / tenancy
documents before or after the raid. Team has not procured any
documents regarding ... prove
their case against the accused.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises
present at the time of inspection.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises ... confirmed
in which accused was acquitted as company failed to procure the
documents of occupancy / ownership. So, the assertion
reported to the local police.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry ... Guddu in which accused was acquitted as company
failed to procure the documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
Singh at site.
10. The company did not procure the documents pertaining to
occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises. No inquiry in
this ... confirmed in which
accused was acquitted as company failed to procure the documents
of occupancy / ownership.
11. The company was under obligation to prove
actual registered consumer of the premises.
They did not procure any documents pertaining to the
ownership / occupancy on record. No inquiry on the aspect ... Page 8/14
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
No inquiry in this
proved by positive evidence.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises.
Page ... Guddu in which accused was acquitted as company
failed to procure the documents of occupancy / ownership.
10. The company was under obligation to prove
ownership / tenancy documents
before or after the raid. Team has not procured any documents
regarding the ownership of the premises. Public persons were not
made ... prove their case against the accused.
9. The company did not procure the documents
pertaining to occupancy or the ownership of the inspected premises
