Consultants Private Limited is a company controlled by Mr.
Sharad Arora (proforma party No. 1).
10. Proforma party No. 1, Mr. Sharad Arora ... founder promoter
and former Managing Director of petitioner No. 2, while proforma party
No. 2, Mr. Rajeev Arora, also a founder promoter, served as Director
Nest,, Rajiv Nagar, Yousufguda, Hyderabad
(Respondents No. 4 to 17 are proforma parties to this Writ Petition).
18 Branch Manager,, M/s. State Bank ... Circle,, Vadodra - 390 007, Gujarat.
(Respondents No. 4 to 7 are proforma parties to this W.P.).
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition Under Article
Near Nehru Sidhant Kendra, Pakhowal
Road, Ludhiana Through its Branch Manager.
.....Proforma Parties
BEFORE: JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT MR. PREETINDER
SINGH, MEMBER
PRESENT ... Gaurav Gupta, Advocate, for the proforma party No. 4-on VC
Sh. Sagar Kumar, Advocate, proxy for Sh. Atul Goyal, Advocate, for proforma
party
Kunwar Singh vs ) State Of Nctr Of Delhi (Proforma Party) on 8 January, 2018
IN THE COURT OF SH. ANIL KUMAR SISODIA : ASJ 04
EAST ... Delhi.
.....Revisionist/Accused
Vs.
1) State of NCTR of Delhi (Proforma Party)
(Through SHO/IO PS Gandhi Nagar)
2) Raksh @ Lucky,
S/o Late
apply and clause 24 is for other details as per the proforma
charter party. Clause 44 of the proforma charter party provides inter alia ... agreed upon by the parties,
(a) a party fails to act as required under such procedure; or
(b) the parties, or two arbitrators, are unable
Natabar Sahu, father of the original petitioner
(Biswanath Sahu) and proforma opposite parties no.4 and
5, claiming to be a landless person applied ... dated
11.05.1971. After the death of Natabar Sahu, the petitioner
and proforma opposite parties no.4 and 5, succeeded the
same. As per the lease
land in question was transferred in favour of the petitioner and
proforma opposite party Nos.4 to 11, who thereafter converted it
to homestead under ... opposite party
No.12 and Mr. Rath, learned counsel for opposite party Nos.4 to
11 besides Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for opposite party
Madhya Marg, Chandigarh, through its General Manager/ Authorized Signatory
.....Proforma Opposite Party No.3
Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
BEFORE ... parties.
For the reasons recorded above, the complaint is partly accepted, with costs, qua Opposite Parties No.1 and 2. As such, Opposite Parties
actually Opposite Parties? if so who's Opposite Parties?
8. Whether the Opposite Parties exclusively and/or jointly/severally with the Proforma Opposite Parties ... necessary party, as to the necessary parties, in question in this proceeding and non-joinder/miss-joinder of any necessary party we find that
actually Opposite Parties? if so who's Opposite Parties?
8. Whether the Opposite Parties exclusively and/or jointly/severally with the Proforma Opposite Parties ... necessary party, as to the necessary parties, in question in this proceeding and non-joinder/miss-joinder of any necessary party we find that
