Near Nehru Sidhant Kendra, Pakhowal
Road, Ludhiana Through its Branch Manager.
.....Proforma Parties
BEFORE: JUSTICE RAJ SHEKHAR ATTRI, PRESIDENT MR. PREETINDER
SINGH, MEMBER
PRESENT ... Gaurav Gupta, Advocate, for the proforma party No. 4-on VC
Sh. Sagar Kumar, Advocate, proxy for Sh. Atul Goyal, Advocate, for proforma
party
SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,
JHALLAR, TEHSIL-BHAINSDEHI, DISTRICT-BETUL (M.P.)
(PROFORMA PARTY)
4. GOVERNMENT OF M.P.
THROUGH COLLECTOR, LAND REVENUE,
DISTRICT-BETUL ... PROFORMA PARTY) ... RESPONDENTS
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2025
(Arising out of the order dated 10.09.2025 passed in First Appeal No.1407/2024 by this
SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,
JHALLAR, TEHSIL-BHAINSDEHI, DISTRICT-BETUL (M.P.)
(PROFORMA PARTY)
4. GOVERNMENT OF M.P.
THROUGH COLLECTOR, LAND REVENUE,
DISTRICT-BETUL ... PROFORMA PARTY) ... RESPONDENTS
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2025
(Arising out of the order dated 10.09.2025 passed in First Appeal No.1407/2024 by this
SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,
JHALLAR, TEHSIL-BHAINSDEHI, DISTRICT-BETUL (M.P.)
(PROFORMA PARTY)
4. GOVERNMENT OF M.P.
THROUGH COLLECTOR, LAND REVENUE,
DISTRICT-BETUL ... PROFORMA PARTY) ... RESPONDENTS
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2025
(Arising out of the order dated 10.09.2025 passed in First Appeal No.1407/2024 by this
SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,
JHALLAR, TEHSIL-BHAINSDEHI, DISTRICT-BETUL (M.P.)
(PROFORMA PARTY)
4. GOVERNMENT OF M.P.
THROUGH COLLECTOR, LAND REVENUE,
DISTRICT-BETUL ... PROFORMA PARTY) ... RESPONDENTS
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2025
(Arising out of the order dated 10.09.2025 passed in First Appeal No.1407/2024 by this
SEWA SAHAKARI SAMITI MARYADIT,
JHALLAR, TEHSIL-BHAINSDEHI, DISTRICT-BETUL (M.P.)
(PROFORMA PARTY)
4. GOVERNMENT OF M.P.
THROUGH COLLECTOR, LAND REVENUE,
DISTRICT-BETUL ... PROFORMA PARTY) ... RESPONDENTS
REVIEW APPLICATION NO.55 OF 2025
(Arising out of the order dated 10.09.2025 passed in First Appeal No.1407/2024 by this
Madhya Marg, Chandigarh, through its General Manager/ Authorized Signatory
.....Proforma Opposite Party No.3
Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
BEFORE ... parties.
For the reasons recorded above, the complaint is partly accepted, with costs, qua Opposite Parties No.1 and 2. As such, Opposite Parties
Directors: SCO No.153-155, Sector 8C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160018.
.....Proforma opposite party no.3
Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection ... opposite party no.3, opposite parties no.1 and 2 shall be bound to pay the equated monthly installments/Pre-EMI interest to proforma opposite
actual payment besides payment of
litigation costs.
2.
The complaint
qua Proforma Opposite Party (now Proforma respondent in the appeal) was
dismissed with no order ... unfair trade
practice. The remaining averments, were denied, being wrong.
6.
Proforma Opposite
Party (hereinafter to be referred as Proforma Opposite Party/Opposite Party
Commissioner, Mini Secretariat, Deputy Commissioner Office Complex, Sector-1, Panchkula-134109
.....Proforma Parties 4 to 10
Complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection ... Commissioner, Mini Secretariat, Deputy Commissioner Office Complex, Sector-1, Panchkula-134109
.....Proforma Parties 4 to 10
Argued by: - Complainants in person.
=====================================================
Complaint case
