cable television networks of the respondents which are telecasting indecent, vulgar, obscene programmes of inducing, glorifying violence, crimes, obscenity in particular on women and children ... censorship of programmes telecast by private television channels, though they are required to adhere to the provisions of programmes/advertising codes prescribed under the Cable
contention of the petitioner that while advertising the
products in television, the advertisers persuade the viewers to buy
their products by depicting women ... through a cable service, any programme, unless such programme
is in conformity with the prescribed programme code. Similarly,
advertisements can be issued only
Commission.
The complainant submits that the information regarding violation of programmes and
advertising codes, which is the core work of EMMC is not provided
advertising content for the
advertising industry and is dealing with the complaints received from
consumer and industry against advertisements which considered in
violation of code ... clear that the
respondents are well competent to check the programmes and
advertisements which encourages superstitious or blind belief. Rule 7 (a)
of Cable Network
Inspector Umesh Vashisht has admitted that Programmes connected
in this case were sponsored Programmes and the letter Ex.PW-7/2 is
in respect ... Page 13 of 71
their respective statements recorded U/s. 313 Cr.P.C . regarding this
acquaintance and business dealing with them stands proved from
Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications ... vs Commissioner Of Income Tax ??? Iii on 16 March, 2015
Author
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation & Anr. vs Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. on 7 October, 2015
Ratan Lal Bagri And Ors. vs The State Of Rajasthan & Ors. on 10 August
Rajasthan State Highways Act, 2014
RAJASTHAN
India
Rajasthan State Highways Act, 2014
Act 22 of
Hardik Bharatbhai Patel Thro. His Fater ... vs State Of Gujarat & on 18 December, 2015
