Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 164 (0.03 seconds)

Mangharam vs State And Ors. on 5 December, 1964

Building Superintendent and the Commissioner in removing a portion of the projection from roof of the shop of the complainant in the first instance. There ... 27th April, 1961 that the complainant was not going to remove the projecting structure and therefore, projection and unauthorised structure should be removed. In pursuance
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 15 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

Maan Singh vs State Of H.P on 6 January, 2023

owned land. However, one side of the roof of his house was found to be projected outside the boundary of his owned land. 3. Learned ... mutually decide the dispute with the accused Balak Ram regarding projections of the roof. But the victim Pradeep Kumar insisted that the projections should
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - J R Dua - Full Document

Maan Singh vs State Of H.P on 6 January, 2023

owned land. However, one side of the roof of his house was found to be projected outside the boundary of his owned land. 3. Learned ... mutually decide the dispute with the accused Balak Ram regarding projections of the roof. But the victim Pradeep Kumar insisted that the projections should
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - J R Dua - Full Document

Office Address vs Government Of Tamil Nadu on 26 April, 2023

Rawat, Director, Bridge and Roof Co.(India) Ltd., Employer / Contractor, Construction Site Address: 1x800 MW North Chennai Thermal Power Project, (Stage III) – BTG Package, Athipattu ... Bridge and Roof Co.(India) Ltd., Employer / Contractor, Construction Site Address: 1x800 MW North Chennai Thermal Power Project, (Stage III) – BTG Package, Athipattu, Thiruvallur District
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next