remove the three windows and the eaves of the tiled roof projection towards the suit property situated in the eaves of the tiled roof projection ... rejected the prayer of the defendants to have the defendants' roof projecting over the suit property and that right was acquired by the plaintiff
plaintiff has been used for the
extension of the roof projection with the object of draining the water
falling on the roof as well ... feet on the
western side of the property where the roof projection of her house
http://www.judis.nic.in
14
is protruding
complaint before the
police that the roof is projecting. The width of the projection in the
roof is only ½ feet which is 12 feet above ... seen that the appellant has constructed a roof
projecting into the suit property. There is ½ feet projection into
the suit property. Since a new cause
dearly supports the appellants. It was found in that case that the roof of the defendant's house overhanging the space which belonged ... recover possession of the space occupied by the defendant's projecting roof.
3. The case in Nritta Kumari Dassi v. Puddomoni Bewah
clearly supports the appellants. It was found in that case that the roof of the defendant's house overhanging the space which belonged ... recover possession of the space occupied by the defendant's projecting roof.
3. The case in Mutta Kumari Dassi v. Puddomani Bewah
relief
of mandatory injunction for removing the door, windows and the projected
asbestos roof installed in the suit sketch Ex.A1 mentioned XY Common ... cannot open the door and windows and the Asbestos
roof is projected 3'7" over the 1st plaintiff's property.
4) Whether
solar power generation would be achieved through Utility
Scale Projects, Roof Tops and REC mechanism. The Solar Energy Policy
mandates 6% Solar Purchase Obligation
further submit that the plaintiff's wall shelf, the concrete roof projection of
his house covered a major portion of the common wall ... wall. For doing
that work, the wall shelf projections and the roof concrete projections
are causing hindrance to the new wall construction of the house
tiled house in his property.
However, the roofs and eaves are projecting beyond the north-south
boundary of the property of the defendant and protrudes ... relief of mandatory injunction directing the defendant to remove all the
projecting roof and the materials beyond the western boundary line of
his property
till the end
of the southern side boundary and that his roof projects over the
property of the plaintiffs. It is further observed that
