viii. That the plaintiff has done extra work in respect
of projection of roofing.
ix. There is no material to demonstrate that the
plaintiff ... plaintiff
has done extra work in respect of the doors and
roofing projection.
xiv. That there is no agreement to pay the interest.
The Trial
shape of raising of walls and columns at Terrace of roof,
projections by M/S sheets and M/S angles, for taking the
necessary demolition
further contended that basement roof projected
continuous external floor of about three feet width is built
around the building on three sides i.e., north
meter which is required for the installation of
solar roof top project based on the petitioner representation dated
09.01.2023.
For Petitioner : Ms.Sujatha
For Respondents ... petitioner wants the benefit of net metering for installing the
solar roof top project. In this regard, he has given representation dated
09.01.2023. The respondents
Nizamuddin
WPA 13034 OF 2023
22.06.2023 M/s. The Road and Roof Projects
Sl no. 32
Ct no. 2 - Vs -
P.M. Assistant Commissioner, State
Nizamuddin
WPA 13043 OF 2023
22.06.2023 M/s. The Road and Roof Projects
Sl no. 33
Ct no. 2 - Vs -
P.M. Assistant Commissioner, State
expenses relating to relevant project are recorded to that project
account and there after all indirect expenses common to all projects are accounted ... expenses relating to relevant project are recorded to that
project account and thereafter all indirect expenses common to all projects
defendants contacted the plaintiff for installation of
project of roof kite (Fabric Ferari) and car parking and the
plaintiff accepted the offer of the defendants ... Photographs of showing the collapse of installation of
project in roof kite are Ex.PW1/10 (colly 17 photographs).
k) payment receipt of photographs
owned land. However, one
side of the roof of his house was found to be projected outside
the boundary of his owned land.
3. Learned ... mutually decide the dispute with the accused Balak
Ram regarding projections of the roof. But the victim Pradeep
Kumar insisted that the projections should
land, the respondents while constructing the
first floor, projected 18 inch of their roof on 15 inch of their
earlier left land and also ... land of the appellant. This
extension of 18 inch through projection of the roof on first floor
is the bone of contention in between
