Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1834 (1.89 seconds)

State vs . 1. Dalip Kumar on 31 August, 2009

connect him with the offence of rape. The absence of the smegma is not necessarily a conclusive proof of the fact of recent cohabitation ... been held as under:­ " S. 375 - Rape - Proof - Accused alleged to have kidnapped prosecutrix and committed rape on her - Concurrent finding that prosecutrix
Delhi District Court Cites 12 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sunil Tyagi on 5 October, 2010

actions. It is very strange that despite the accused committing rape upon her in her own room, she did not raise any voice ... been held that:­ "Penal Code (45 of 1860), S. 375 - Rape - Proof - Accused alleged to have kidnapped prosecutrix and committed rape on her - Concurrent
Delhi District Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Accused on 26 March, 2013

prosecutrix also deposed that as soon as accused after committing rape on her went out from her house, the wife of his landlord Smt. Poonam ... evidence of rape. She admitted that there was no conclusive proof of rape during the course of medical examination of the prosecutrix. In cross examination
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next