Bairagya State Upgraded Middle School but the Prosecution has
withheld the documentary proof in regard to her age, whereas as
per Section ... victim was found to be ruptured, it
is not conclusive proof of rape. There may be various reasons for
rupture of hymen.
45. The Court
trial to establish
the prosecution's case of commission of rape by these appellants
on the victim. As a matter of fact, the prosecution ... much
relevance to the extent the same relate to proof of rape and
murder of the victim by these appellants.
7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor
trial to establish
the prosecution's case of commission of rape by these appellants
on the victim. As a matter of fact, the prosecution ... much
relevance to the extent the same relate to proof of rape and
murder of the victim by these appellants.
7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor
trial to establish
the prosecution's case of commission of rape by these appellants
on the victim. As a matter of fact, the prosecution ... much
relevance to the extent the same relate to proof of rape and
murder of the victim by these appellants.
7. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor
victim but that is not the conclusive proof of occurrence
of committing rape against the victim by the appellant as the victim
in her cross ... private part, in my considered opinion, is not conclusive
proof of committing rape against the victim in view of the
aforesaid statement of victim about
learned counsel
for the appellants about proof of the commission of
offence of rape on the prosecutrix. It was contended
that the prosecutrix was found
learned counsel
for the appellants about proof of the commission of
offence of rape on the prosecutrix. It was contended
that the prosecutrix was found
appellant of the first
case has further stated that there is no proof of the fact that the
prosecutrix is below 18 years ... proof of commission of rape of the prosecutrix by the appellant
of the first case. It is submitted that the conviction of the
appellant
appellant of the first
case has further stated that there is no proof of the fact that the
prosecutrix is below 18 years ... proof of commission of rape of the prosecutrix by the appellant
of the first case. It is submitted that the conviction of the
appellant
appellant of the first
case has further stated that there is no proof of the fact that the
prosecutrix is below 18 years ... proof of commission of rape of the prosecutrix by the appellant
of the first case. It is submitted that the conviction of the
appellant
