recording of statement under
Section 164 of Cr.PC on 17.07.2018, prosecutrix was died on
18.08.2021 and could not examine before the trial Court,
therefore ... that it is the statement of prosecutrix other than
the confessional statement. In the instant case, prosecutrix has
died before examination of the trial Court
recording of statement under
Section 164 of Cr.PC on 17.07.2018, prosecutrix was died on
18.08.2021 and could not examine before the trial Court,
therefore ... that it is the statement of prosecutrix other than
the confessional statement. In the instant case, prosecutrix has
died before examination of the trial Court
recording of statement under
Section 164 of Cr.PC on 17.07.2018, prosecutrix was died on
18.08.2021 and could not examine before the trial Court,
therefore ... that it is the statement of prosecutrix other than
the confessional statement. In the instant case, prosecutrix has
died before examination of the trial Court
house of prosecutrix.
The accused put off the lamp and pushed the prosecutrix on cot. Accused
threatened to kill the prosecutrix and committed rape upon ... prosecutrix returned home. She narrated
the incident to her husband. Panchayat was called in the village.
Thereafter, sister-in-law of the prosecutrix died
solemnized
between prosecutrix and appellant/accused in the presence of family members
of both the parties. Father of prosecutrix has died and her mother ... that prosecution and appellant are husband and wife. Father of the
prosecutrix has died and her mother has re-married.
5. The prosecutrix herself appeared
appellant Shivdhan
Soren raped her.
14. It appears that the prosecutrix Barki Hansda died during the course
of treatment. She could not be examined during ... written statement has not been adduced in
evidence. The prosecutrix died just after the occurrence and as such, her
statement could not be recorded during
Gynaecologist and SPO.
12. Prosecution, however, got the statements of PW-1 (Prosecutrix) and
PW-3 (Shakeel Ahmed) only recorded in support of the charges ... Prosecutrix) stated that said statement was made by her under public
pressure. Complainant, who was father of the prosecutrix, died before the
trial and, therefore
filed by
the complainant alleging therein that husband of the prosecutrix died
and the prosecutrix was residing along at village Charrapara,
Podiuproda, P.S. Bango
applicant but she is second wife because first wife has been died.
Prosecutrix quarrels with applicant and hence, she registered the FIR against
Code of
Criminal Procedure. It is further submitted that the prosecutrix died during
trial before her statement could be recorded. It is submitted that these
