Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4111 (1.40 seconds)

State vs Jitender on 29 November, 2017

prosecutrix and when he remanded back the same, the husband of the prosecutrix refused and the husband of the prosecutrix in collusion with the prosecutrix ... statement under Section 164  Cr.P.C. The statement under  Section 164  Cr.P.C. is a previous   statement   of   the   prosecutrix   recorded   before
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Vipin Nahar @ Dev on 26 August, 2014

given their statements and he recorded the same. Attested copies of their statements are already on judicial record. Statement of prosecutrix (name withheld) dated ... complaining statement Ex. PW1/A is the statement upon which the FIR was registered. The same is a typed statement and the prosecutrix only
Delhi District Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Munna on 21 November, 2014

posted the matter forthwith for recording the statement. He recorded the statement of the prosecutrix (name withheld) vide proceedings running into three pages marked ... Munna and prosecutrix (name withheld) were medically examined. Prosecutrix (name withheld) refused to get herself internally medically examined. Accused Munna and prosecutrix (name withheld) were
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Sazid on 16 August, 2014

inquiry about accused Sazid and prosecutrix (name withheld). Father of prosecutrix (name withheld) handed over birth certificate of prosecutrix (name withheld) issued by MCD Mark ... making her statement voluntarily and without any pressure and she is competent to depose. Therefore, he recorded statement of prosecutrix (name withheld). The statement
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Parmod on 26 April, 2013

Umesh Kumar produced the prosecutrix and accused in the P.S. and on inquiry, prosecutrix gave her statement wherein she disclosed that accused had taken ... established physical relations with the prosecutrix against her will and consent. The prosecutrix was further confronted with her statement Mark
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs (1) Mukul Siriswal on 15 February, 2014

which were deposited in the malkhana, getting the statement of prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC recorded before ld. MM and collection ... copy of the said statement thereafter. He further deposed that in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.PC, the Prosecutrix named Kanhaiya, Mukul, Rohit
Delhi District Court Cites 22 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Dinesh Chand Yadav on 9 December, 2016

that the prosecutrix is fit for statement. SI Anita came to the hospital and recorded her statement. The prosecutrix was referred to gynecology department ... that time the prosecutrix was found fit for statement. This witness recorded the statement of the prosecutrix Ex.PW2/A. The prosecutrix was then
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sc No: 57787/16 State vs . Lokender & Ors. on 16 July, 2016

prosecutrix and handed over to IO. 13. PW7 is prosecutrix. She supported the prosecution case. Prosecutrix testified that after she was recovered her statement ... called brother of prosecutrix and prosecutrix also had conversation with her brother thereafter accused dropped prosecutrix at Old Delhi Railway Station on a platform from
Delhi District Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next