Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4636 (1.85 seconds)

Ashok Narang vs State on 12 January, 2012

another. On this statement, present case was registered against the appellant. iii. Statement Ex.PW16/A given by PW1 Prosecutrix to the Doctor during ... statement of the prosecutrix PW1 Ms.Satnam Kaur under Section 164 Cr. P. C. Since the prosecutrix had been making contradictory statements at various stages
Delhi High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 172 - S K Kait - Full Document

State vs . Munna on 21 November, 2014

posted the matter forthwith for recording the statement. He recorded the statement of the prosecutrix (name withheld) vide proceedings running into three pages marked ... Munna and prosecutrix (name withheld) were medically examined. Prosecutrix (name withheld) refused to get herself internally medically examined. Accused Munna and prosecutrix (name withheld) were
Delhi District Court Cites 39 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . 1. Sazid on 16 August, 2014

inquiry about accused Sazid and prosecutrix (name withheld). Father of prosecutrix (name withheld) handed over birth certificate of prosecutrix (name withheld) issued by MCD Mark ... making her statement voluntarily and without any pressure and she is competent to depose. Therefore, he recorded statement of prosecutrix (name withheld). The statement
Delhi District Court Cites 30 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Rajesh Sharma on 19 October, 2013

CrPC and thereafter her statement u/s.164 CrPC was also got recorded. In both these statements, prosecutrix alleged that accused had taken ... after eating the same, she (prosecutrix) lost her consciousness. The prosecutrix, however, made another statement u/s. 161 CrPC wherein she stated that
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Parmod on 26 April, 2013

Umesh Kumar produced the prosecutrix and accused in the P.S. and on inquiry, prosecutrix gave her statement wherein she disclosed that accused had taken ... established physical relations with the prosecutrix against her will and consent. The prosecutrix was further confronted with her statement Mark
Delhi District Court Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Imran on 20 October, 2022

Garden, Delhi. It is further stated that on dated 26.05.2015, the statement of prosecutrix 'RS' was recorded ... examination of the prosecutrix done and voluntarily deposed that the prosecutrix was medically examined at Delhi. He has denied that the prosecutrix was not recovered
Delhi District Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Sujeet Kumar on 15 April, 2013

mere sath pyar karegi' but prosecutrix refused. At that time mother of prosecutrix was working while prosecutrix was standing alone and accused took ... Badri Khan, father of prosecutrix, PW­4 Smt. Inama, mother of prosecutrix, to corroborate testimony of prosecutrix, however, these two witnesses have given a different
Delhi District Court Cites 11 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next