Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 5417 (1.48 seconds)

Ashok Narang vs State on 12 January, 2012

another. On this statement, present case was registered against the appellant. iii. Statement Ex.PW16/A given by PW1 Prosecutrix to the Doctor during ... statement of the prosecutrix PW1 Ms.Satnam Kaur under Section 164 Cr. P. C. Since the prosecutrix had been making contradictory statements at various stages
Delhi High Court Cites 51 - Cited by 172 - S K Kait - Full Document

Vikram Khimta vs State Of H.P on 1 November, 2018

regard to the correctness of version putforth by the prosecutrix (PW2). Prosecutrix in her statement deposed that on 15.6.2013, she again requested the accused ... material contradictions in the statements having been made by the aforesaid material prosecution witnesses. If the statement of PW2 (prosecutrix) is examined/analyzed juxtaposing statements
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 42 - Cited by 2 - S Sharma - Full Document

State vs Jitender on 29 November, 2017

prosecutrix and when he remanded back the same, the husband of the prosecutrix refused and the husband of the prosecutrix in collusion with the prosecutrix ... statement under Section 164  Cr.P.C. The statement under  Section 164  Cr.P.C. is a previous   statement   of   the   prosecutrix   recorded   before
Delhi District Court Cites 21 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next