compensation under protest keeping their right alive and that payment be made to them under protest. Petitioners subsequently filed an application under Section ... without any protest. He categorically denied that petitioner made application of protest on 7-4 -69 but made it on 16-4-69. To this
Police Station-Amethi, District-Sultanpur (now District-Amethi), whereby the protest application of the revisionist has been rejected.
4. The brief facts giving rise ... filed on 30.11.2004 before the court concerned along with the protest application.
12. It is noted here that vide Parcha No.15 of the Case
examined at District Hospital on 21.01.2020.
(ix) On receipt of notice, protest application was filed. According to the protest application, particularly paragraphs ... dated 23.11.2021.
(xiii) After the aforesaid final report, protest application dated 29.06.2022 was filed by injured-opposite party No.2, copy of which has been
offence in the protest memo.
16. I have perused the protest memo admittedly it
is not by the complainant, but the protest memo is filed ... protest
petition it is not in the form of complaint, when that is so,
: 20 :
the question of learned Magistrate looking into the protest
application
that no
offence was proved. The first Respondent also filed a Protest Application
on 27.05.2014 in case Crime No.105/2013 which was accepted ... final Report on 10.01.2015 stating that
no offence was proved. Another Protest Application was filed and once
more re-investigation was done on 17.11.2016, subsequent
benefits. After passing of
award, the claimants have received award amount under
protest and filed 18 applications before the respondent.
Accordingly the respondent has referred ... award passed by the
respondent is very meager and there is no application of
mind by the respondent by passing the award. It is stated
benefits. After passing of
award, the claimants have received award amount under
protest and filed 18 applications before the respondent.
Accordingly the respondent has referred ... award passed by the
respondent is very meager and there is no application of
mind by the respondent by passing the award. It is stated
against the appellant. On May 7, 1966, the appellant filed
a protest application requesting the Chief Presidency
Magistrate to take the matter ... argued that there was no reference of the receipt in
the protest application, dated May 7, 1966, that likewise,
there was no reference therein
opportunity was given to
the complainant/original informant to submit any protest
application or not. Assuming that nonfiling of the charge
sheet/challan against ... required to be given an
14
opportunity to submit the protest application and, thereafter,
after giving an opportunity to the complainant/original
informant, the Magistrate
court concerned and on receipt of the same the complainant moved protest application and also filed affidavits of Binte Johra, Amir Raza, Shafiful Hasan ... needed then it will be proper for Magistrate to treat the protest application as complaint and proceed with the case as complainant case
