Police Station-Amethi, District-Sultanpur (now District-Amethi), whereby the protest application of the revisionist has been rejected.
4. The brief facts giving rise ... filed on 30.11.2004 before the court concerned along with the protest application.
12. It is noted here that vide Parcha No.15 of the Case
police, the right of the complainant to file a protest application is not taking away and in fact on said protest application be filed ... made in the protest petition was treated as a complaint.
8. The learned Magistrate in the present case considered the protest application, the final report
family members. On notice, Priya entered appearance and filed a
protest application before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kuzhithurai,
which was taken on file ... therefore, the defacto complainant
has the opportunity to file a protest application. When a protest application
is filed, the learned Magistrate has got the following
been closed as action dropped. Therefore, the petitioner filed a Protest Application before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore and the same has been ... Special Courts in Tamil Nadu, the petitioner had rightly filed the Protest Application before the jurisdictional Magistrate viz., the Judicial Magistrate No.II, Coimbatore
Suganthi and should have given her an opportunity to file a protest application as held by the Supreme Court in Bhagwant Singh vs. Commissioner ... protest petition within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
8.On filing of the protest application by Suganthi
mistake of fact. On notice to the petitioner, he filed a
protest application, which has been taken ... Dindigul, who by order dated 07.11.2017,
has dismissed the protest application and accepted the closure report.
Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present
counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has filed a protest application before the Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram, but, however, the Magistrate, has not entertained ... protest application on the ground that the petition filed by the petitioner in Crl.OP.No.27131 of 2017 to transfer the investigation
there are other accused also, who were not charged
and that protest application is pending before the III Additional Chief
Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada ... learned III Additional
Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, to dispose of the protest
application preferably within one month from the date of receipt of a
copy
learned Magistrate issued notice to
Ramasamy, but, he has filed his protest application. After considering the
protest application and the material gathered by the police ... during
investigation, the learned Magistrate, by order dated 03.12.2016, rejected
the protest application and accepted the closure report, challenging which,
Ramasamy has filed the present
already challenged
the 'B' report by filing the protest application. If
the child has died on account of medical
negligence ... reserving the liberty to the petitioner to take his
protest application (which he has filed for
challenging the 'B' report) to its logical
