petitioner has failed to prove that he had filed the protest application within 90 days of such award notice.
4. It has been contended ... notice under Section 12(2) had been issued and served and protest application under Section 18(1) was barred by time and it should have
copies of the books in Mysore and other places and there were protests from the followers of Basaveshwara. Therefore, the Government has issued a notification ... contended that the grounds given for forfeiture disclose a total lack of application of mind, and the grounds given are untenable, absurd, wholly imaginary
Tam Tam Pedda Guruva Reddy vs State Of Karnataka And Another on 26 May, 1998
Gram Panchayat, Ugargol Village, ... vs State Of Karnataka And Others on 27 October, 1998
Equivalent
Dr. M.V. Shetty Memorial Trust, ... vs Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health ... on 26 May
J.M. Eswaraiah And Others vs Subramanya And Others on 24 July, 1998
Equivalent citations
T. Giri Thimmaiah vs Karnataka Electricity Board And Ors. on 14 August, 1998
Equivalent citations
Naveen Kumar And Others vs State By Circle Inspector Of Police, ... on 30 July, 1998
tenant has stated that the landlord has received the rents without any protest. This also is patently false. It is clear from the entries ... because the rents have been already paid on the date of the application. This Court has further laid down that
K. Raja Rao vs Syndicate Bank And Ors. on 10 July, 1998
Equivalent citations: ILR1998KAR4044
