mistake of fact. On notice to the petitioner, he filed a
protest application, which has been taken ... Dindigul, who by order dated 07.11.2017,
has dismissed the protest application and accepted the closure report.
Challenging the same, the petitioner has filed the present
learned Magistrate issued notice to
Ramasamy, but, he has filed his protest application. After considering the
protest application and the material gathered by the police ... during
investigation, the learned Magistrate, by order dated 03.12.2016, rejected
the protest application and accepted the closure report, challenging which,
Ramasamy has filed the present
respondent police.
Liberty is given to the petitioner to file a protest application before the
learned Judicial Magistrate III, Salem and on such protest application
C.Hindumathi vs The State Of Ap., on 11 September, 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT
Smt. C.Hindumathi vs The State Of A.P. Represented By Its ... on 11 September
C Hindumathi vs State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp on 11 September, 2018
IN
Smt. C. Hindumathi vs The State Of A.P Rep By Its P.P on
respondent police.
Liberty is given to the petitioner to file a protest application before the
learned Judicial Magistrate III, Salem and on such protest application
allegations against the A.2 are false
thereby not charged, a protest application was filed by the defacto-
complainant before the learned I Addl.JFCM ... from the police final
report and protest application, the alleged beating in causing so called
simple injury, was while the defacto-complainant was in police
fact.
On notice, the petitioner / de facto complainant filed a protest application
before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai ... closure report filed by
the respondent ? Police and rejected the protest application filed by the
petitioner / de facto complainant. Challenging the same, the petitioner
