application under Section 18 .
Mr. Dutt appearing for the petitioner states that the application was for the money to be paid under protest and therefore ... proper document wherein to record such a protest. A protest ought to be made, firstly, in the application for receiving the disputed amount of compensation
significance can be attached to the receipt of payment under protest. A protest is contemplated at the time of the receipt of payment. It would ... postulates a tender of payment and receipt thereof without protest or under protest. Such a protest must necessarily be made at the time when
date of receiving notice of such Award, require the Taluqdar by written application that the matter be referred to the Court for determination, whether ... person receives the amount without such protest, he shall not be entitled to make an application, under Section 14 .
(3) Nothing contained in this section
August 1, the respondent filed an application for directing Government to
produce some documents. The respondent protested against the conduct of the prosecution by Ambica
with the income-tax return. In his application dated September 21, 1961, the Income-tax Officer protested that he was being compelled to produce
states, in the very first paragraph, that,
"In spite of protest being made as to legality and genuineness of the acquisition of the lands ... application under Section 18 of the Act in this case it was mentioned that in spite of
the protest made by the respondent, the said
transaction of sale with respect to the amount referred to in the application and the transaction involved a contract for the sale of goods ... West Bengal, (e) whether the application is barred by alternative remedies.
5. The petitioner has already paid, under protest, half of the tax assessed
Court after hearing the appellant and the Union of India, dismissed the application on December 4, 1961. The Judgment of the Punjab High Court ... with effect from 27th December,
"In these circumstances, I must respectfully protest against what I consider to be an unjust interference on your part
Kalinga Tubes Ltd. And Ors. vs Shanti Prasad Jain And Ors. on 18 April, 1963
Commissioner of Police had informed the petitioner that his application for having his nephew Choithrsrn recognised as his agent, was granted and that he should ... reserved to him under Section 33 of the aforesaid Act. The petitioner protested against the refusal and pointed out that he had not committed
