Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

marked on behalf of the claimant, Ex. A-1 is the protest application given by the claimant. Ex. A-2 is the certified copy

have made an oral protest. Evidently, after receiving the compensation on 28-2-1998 the petitioner filed a protest application on 10-3-1998, which ... does not prescribe any particular mode of protest and such an oral protest is a valid protest under law. 12. In Kotipalli Chitti v. Special

objection, except such (if any) of them as have consented without protest to receive payment of the compensation awarded and (3) if the objection ... received the amount otherwise than under protest shall be entitled to make any application under Section 18 : Provided also that nothing herein contained shall effect

appellant refused to issue application to the writ petitioner on the ground that he professes protestant faith and not roman catholic faith. The petitioner made ... application form to the petitioner, pursuant whereto, he could file his application. But, his application was rejected on the ground that he professes protestant faith

respondent to issue application form for admission. Accordingly, on 23-11-2000 the 5th respondent issued necessary application form and registered his name after payment ... allotted a seat but rejected his application on the ground that he professes Protestant faith. Aggrieved of such action of the respondents, the present writ

acquired. The petitioners also submit that they filed such application and received the compensation under protest. But ultimately the claims of the petitioners were

Principal Act, two months period is available for making an application under reference to the civil Court, from the date of service of the notice ... appellants to make an application for reference under Section 18 of the Act. 11. Admittedly, the claimants have made an application seeking reference under Section

6248 of 2001 is, as to whether the respondent could file an application although he has received the final bill amount. Reference in this connection ... held that the contractor having accepted the final bill without any protest, he had no arbitral dispute. However, the said case was under

settle its claim relating to some transformers. General Electric filed an application in the Mirzapur Court seeking stay of that suit under Section ... Renusagar "in the said suit. Mirzapur Court rejected the said application whereupon Renusagar filed a petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before

shall be construed that the receipt of amounts by the landlord under protest is of no consequence. 29. The tenant has a statutory duty ... facts and circumstances of this case, cannot be said to have any application. Waiver is a doctrine and not a concept, which emanates from