compensation under protest keeping their right alive and that payment be made to them under protest. Petitioners subsequently filed an application under Section ... without any protest. He categorically denied that petitioner made application of protest on 7-4 -69 but made it on 16-4-69. To this
protest petition on 8th January, 2004.
On 22nd July, 2004, the Special Judge, CBI, passed an
order holding that regarding the protest application ... revision petition is directed against the order dated
22.07.2004 whereby the protest application moved on
behalf of the petitioner, according to the petitioner
that application and the application and the payment must be considered to form the same transaction. In that transaction, the protest was incorporated along with ... made an application for payment of compensation without reserving his right to make an application under Section 18 and without any protest. Again
record a Protest under which the compensation amount is to be received and that the Protest ought to be made in the application for receiving ... application under Section 18 contained a protest but subsequently the amount was accepted without any Protest, that application will become barred by proviso
says that the members of the bar had put in an application protesting against the burning of the clothes of the deceased. In his examination
over looked that the I.O in his Reply to the Protest
Application has clearly stated that the Applicant is a victim. It has been ... dismissed with liberty to approach this Court. The Modification
Application along with fresh Bail Application filed by the Applicant already
stands withdrawn. Vide Order dated
Criminal Court is not true because defendants have
filed a protest application in the Court of learned MM for taking action
against the remaining persons
moved again by means of an application, which was described as Protest Application. The Metropolitan Magistrate heard the parties in response to the said Protest ... complaint having been filed and that it was only after the Protest Petition was filed on 5th July, 1990 that the accused became aware
payment is tendered and who receives it otherwise than under protest in making an application under section 18 of the said Act. This second proviso ... relied upon the aforesaid decision in holding that the protest must be recorded in the application if any for the amount as well
filed a protest to the cancellation report but the Court through its order dated 27.4.2005 accepted the cancellation report and rejected the protest petition ... report without a proper appreciation of facts. The Court rejected the protest application without recording any cogent and convincing ground. Counsel contends that the trial
