submitted charge sheet against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 moved protest application. Summoning order has been passed on protest application of the informant/opposite ... party No.2. He further submitted that while submitting protest application, applicants moved affidavit of witness Ibrahim and Azra Parveen along with protest application
before the III Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Pratapgarh, on which protest application was filed. Vide order dated 4.2.2005, final report submitted by the police
criminal were
pending and dispute was not trifling.
FIR and protest application that is complaint named eight
persons and case is registered against four
dated 7.1.222 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad in Protest Application No. 313 of 2020, Jay Prakash Pandey Vs. Deepak Kesarwani & others ... order dated 7.1.22 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad in Protest Application No. 313 of 2020, Jay Prakash Pandey Vs. Deepak Kesarwani & others
order. Thereafter, liberty is given to the
petitioner to file a protest application before the Judicial Magistrate,
Boothapandi, within four weeks.
7.With the above
action against the respondents. As such, she was
constrained to file a protest petition/ complaint.
3. The petitioner led preliminary evidence and appreciating
GAURI SHANKER ... material on file, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hisar
dismissed the application/ protest petition vide order dated 7.1.2013.
Feeling aggrieved, the petitioner filed a revision
Court No. - 16
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1553 of 2023
Applicant :- Uma Shankar @ Aakash
Opposite Party ... initially the police had submitted a final report but upon a protest application, the final report has been rejected and the Court had taken cognizance
local persons, he was rescued and lodged this FIR by moving an application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C.
4. It is contended ... first informant's side.
5. After filing final report a protest application has been filed by the informant and the concerned court of Chief
Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application under section 438 Cr.P.C. has been moved by the applicants after rejecting their anticipatory bail application by the order ... ground that proper investigation was not conducted. In the protest application, it is stated by the informant that the investigating officer, in order to extend
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4057 of 2022
Applicant :- Lekhraj ... credible evidence had been found against the applicants. Thereafter, a protest application has been filed on behalf of informant / complainant on such protest application
