application that an application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. filed by the accused had been tagged with the transfer application of the applicant without ... moved an application under Section 195 / 340 Cr.P.C. and notice of the application had been issued to the applicant. The protest application filed
also sought time to file objections to those untrace DARs.
Thereafter, protest application/petition was filed on 17.09.2016 and the
application ... matter was next posted for
07.01.2017, while the protest application was kept pending.
5. Thereafter, on 07.01.2017, two fresh DARs were filed by the
Investigating
also sought time to file objections to those untrace DARs.
Thereafter, protest application/petition was filed on 17.09.2016 and the
application ... matter was next posted for
07.01.2017, while the protest application was kept pending.
5. Thereafter, on 07.01.2017, two fresh DARs were filed by the
Investigating
Report dated 02.02.2017 was filed, which was protested by the respondent no.2/informant vide his protest application dated 20.04.2017, which was disposed ... complainant/informant has filed the protest petition to include the extraneous matters is such that the protest application has seen treated as complaint case
against respondent no.2 and his
cahoots as Annexure-8.
(vii) Protest petition filed by the petitioner no.2 against
closure/final report as Annexure ... that the second final
report has not been accepted and the protest application
of respondent no.3/complainant is pending disposal.
That
against respondent no.2 and his
cahoots as Annexure-8.
(vii) Protest petition filed by the petitioner no.2 against
closure/final report as Annexure ... that the second final
report has not been accepted and the protest application
of respondent no.3/complainant is pending disposal.
That
against respondent no.2 and his
cahoots as Annexure-8.
(vii) Protest petition filed by the petitioner no.2 against
closure/final report as Annexure ... that the second final
report has not been accepted and the protest application
of respondent no.3/complainant is pending disposal.
That
after filing final report under section 169 Cr.P.C. the protest application filed by applicant No. 1 (Muralidhar Tiwari) in the court of learned ... party No.2, the police filed final report and after filing protest application the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, district- Gonda has passed
Pratap Versus Anup Kumar Singh and others, whereby while deciding a protest application filed by the opposite party no.2 against a final report submitted ... Investigating Officer the learned trial court has not only accepted the protest application and rejected the final report and taken cognizance of offences under Sections
hearing. On 27.05.2010 Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.5 decided protest application and the objection filed by the parties and reached to the conclusion ... been summoned, then the investigating officer has no right to file protest application thereafter. Hence court rejected the final report and summoned the petitioner
