said offence.
6. Aggrieved by the same, the complainant filed a protest application
before the learned Magistrate on 10.10.2014 vide ... sworn
statement recorded by the Magistrate on the protest application. Leave about
L.W.1 Jai Prakash sworn statement, in tune to his report
petitioner. In the normal circumstances, the petitioner should have filed protest application before the Judicial Magistrate, Cheyyar. But whereas, he has field the present contempt ... opportunity should be given to the de facto complainant to file protest application. Therefore, the order dated
complaint case no. 179/2015 was dismissed.
2. Km. Pragti had moved application under section 156(3) Cr.P.C. which was registered ... Pragti had filed protest-petition with request that said protest petition be registered as complaint case. After hearing on this application/protest petition dated
after service of RCS notice on the petitioner. Instead of filing protest application, the petitioner has come up with this petition for a direction ... investigation and this petitioner having missed the bus to file a protest application before the concerned Court, cannot seek to re-open the investigation
learned Sessions Judge, Mahila Court, Tiruchirappalli. The
petitioner herein filed a protest application and the learned Sessions Judge,
considering the evidences on record, accepted ... respondent is manifest from the fact that she filed
a protest petition in Crl.M.P.No.211 of 2015 in Crime
learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the petitioner is at liberty to file protest application and proceed as per law.
With the above observation, this Criminal Original
police officials. It is also submitted that the complainant
had also filed protest petition u/s 173 (8) Cr.PC for
further investigation ... proceedings conducted by Ld. Trial Court on the ground
that his application/protest petition for further
investigation by CBI is pending.
11. The revisionist
investigate the matter.
5. Thereafter, on 11th May 2012 complainant filed a protest
petition against final report on 20th April 2013 and a complaint ... made
following observations:-
"The complainant has filed protest application against
the final report for not charge-sheeting the accused and
submitted that accused
judgment
dated 8.1.2016 in Criminal Misc.Application
No.2165 of 2013 by Family Court No.3,
Ahmedabad. Such application is preferred by
present respondents ... impugned judgment shows
that, though duly served, applicant has
failed to protest the application either by
filing an appearance or by filing his written
statement
from record, are that, on 31.03.2000, applicant-respondent no. 2 filed an application in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahrauni, District Lalitpur with ... When applicant and her husband protested, revisionists tried to kill them. Thereafter, applicant-respondent no. 2 moved an application dated 31.03.2000 under Section
