submitted charge sheet against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 moved protest application. Summoning order has been passed on protest application of the informant/opposite ... party No.2. He further submitted that while submitting protest application, applicants moved affidavit of witness Ibrahim and Azra Parveen along with protest application
Report. Respondent no.3 had
filed a protest application to the final report. The same is pending
consideration before the court below. By virtue ... final order being passed by the court
below on the protest application filed by the third respondent, which
is pending consideration before the court below
informant is
required to be given an opportunity to
submit the protest application and
thereafter, after giving an opportunity
to the informant, the Magistrate
appears from the record that when the final report was filed, protest application was given from the side of informant. It is needless to mention ... order on the final report. When the informant filed the protest application, the legal way of handling the protest petition has no where been flouted
fact.
On notice, the petitioner / de facto complainant filed a protest application
before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukkottai ... closure report filed by
the respondent ? Police and rejected the protest application filed by the
petitioner / de facto complainant. Challenging the same, the petitioner
July, 2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
?Court No. - 87
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9451 of 2022
Applicant :- Dilip Singh ... final report. Learned counsel for the applicant is not sure that protest application against final report is pending or not.
4. On the facts
closing the case as mistake of fact. The petitioner
filed a protest application in Crl.M.P.No.5015 of 2017 in Crime
consequently rejected the application of the Ramadhin Sharma and others. Simultaneously he fixed a date for considering the protest petition relating to the rejection ... opposition to the protest petition and, therefore, avail the chance of convincing the Magistrate that a Final report is correct and protest petition is wrong
Ganganagar, for trial in accordance with law. Arjun Singh informant presented an application before the Sessions Judge, Sri Ganganagar, on 20th October, 1976 that Arjun ... they appeared to have committed. In his application Arjun Singh stated that he had filed a protest-petition also before the Munsiff-cum Judicial Magistrate
file protest petition against the final report. The opposite party no.2 filed protest petition. Learned Magistrate accepted the protest petition and rejected the final ... learned Magistrate without considering the case diary and without application of mind casually treated the protest petition as complaint after rejecting the final report
