ascertained only by other circumstantial pieces of evidence placed before the Court. P.Ws. 9 and 10 are the parents of the deceased. They describe ... sister and both of them took her in spite of their protest. P.W. 10 followed them to the sister's house wherein
sections of I.P.C. and POCSO Act.
6. Learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 submits that protest petition
was filed and once ... P.C. The cognizance is taken under the POCSO Act arising
out of said Mahila P.S. Case No. 43 of 2018. Once the protest
receipt of the same, the petitioner
filed a protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019 and also filed a private
complaint under ... P.C. The learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate dismissed the protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner
receipt of the same, the petitioner
filed a protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019 and also filed a private
complaint under ... P.C. The learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate dismissed the protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner
tried to
remove the branches of the Jamun tree forcibly, they protested.
P.W.2 assaulted the appellant no.1 Nityananda Behera first with ... concerned, P.W.2 has
stated that he along with the deceased, P.W.4 and P.W.5 had
decided to protest
submits that if the evidence of P.W.4 Jago Mandal, P.W.6
Bishwanath Mandal and P.W.7 Ramdeo Prasad Mandal is taken ... P.W.4 Jago Mandal, P.W.6
Bishwanath Mandal and P.W.7 Ramdeo Prasad Mandal clearly
indicates that when P.W.7 reached
effect that as the accused struck the wife of P.W. 1, P.W. 1 protested and scolded the accused by saying how he could ... P. Rajammal, the deceased, P.W. 6 Laxmi and P.W. 5 Sandal, daughter and son of Punnaiah were in the house and P
effect that as the accused struck the wife of P.W.1, P.W.1 protested and scolded the accused by saying how he could ... P. Rajammal, the deceased, P.W.6 Laxmi and P.W.5 Sandal, daughter and son of Punnaiah were in the house and P
Sushma Aind, A.P.P.
(in Cr.M.P. 1646/2019)
Mr. Nawin Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
(in Cr.M.P. No. 1634/2019 ... Mukesh Kr. Sinha, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2
3. Cr.M.P. No. 1646 of 2019 has been filed for quashing
P.W.1. Then,
he (P.W.2) himelf and P.W.1 were going towards that land to protest.
But, at that time ... P.W.2) also informed him
(P.W.1) that, their land was ploughed by the accused persons and when
he (P.W.2) protested
