October, 1980 it had allegedly paid under protest Rs. 1290292.84 P. in excess of the duty payable by the petitioner as per Notification ... that during the aforesaid period the petitioner under protest had paid Rs. 1290292.84 P. in excess of the duty legally payable by the petitioner
petitioner. It was pleaded that during the pendency of the protest
petition, D.G.P. Crimes, Haryana transferred the investigation to the State ... been summoned by the Magistrate. It was urged that thereafter, protest
petition (Annexure P-13) was filed by Anita wife of Kartar Singh wherein
Shahid
held at 4.30 p.m.
The petitioner filed a protest at 4.15 p.m. stating
that the meeting had been adjourned by the Municipal
Commissioner ... leader of the Shiv Sena Party, filed a written protest
at 4.15 p.m. that the meeting had been adjourned by the
Municipal Commissioner
Wilfred D'Souza met the Governor at 4.00 p.m. protested about deliberate stalling of proceedings by the Treasury Benches and the role ... same day, the Speaker met the Governor at 5.00 p.m. and informed him of his inability to conduct the proceedings of the House
said plot two persons, Kesho Prasad (P.W. 3) and Sheo Lakhan Ahir (P.W. 2) to watch the crop sown by him. The respondent ... number of persons differently armed, came to the field and notwithstanding protests by P.W. 3 and his said companion, forcibly harvested the standing crop
P.C. The Magistrate could
not take cognizance under Section 190(1)(b)
Cr.P.C. on the basis of protest petition and
affidavits filed ... P.C. If the Magistrate did not treat the
protest petition as a complaint, the protest petition not
Page 23 of 28
http://www.judis
following order:
Perused the papers and the protest petition. Cognizance taken Under Section 406 , I.P.C. Summon the accused persons fixing ... India. It was registered as P.S. Case No. 19(2) of 1974 under Section 409 , I.P.C. and later G.R. Case
usual practice is for him to file a protest petition before the Sub-divisional Magistrate. Such protest petition may be either anticipatory ... order a formal order under Section 204 Cr. P. C. is not necessary on the protest petition." But the mere omission to pass such
return under protest. During these reassessment proceedings, the Income-tax Officer, vide his order dated March 22, 1971 (annexure P-4), came to the conclusion ... Amritsar. The petitioner, through its different communications, annexures P-6, P-7 and P-8, protested to the Income-tax Officer that the impugned notice
press had been purchased by accused 3 through P.W. 2. One day early in March P.W. 1 got back the mounted blocks from ... proofs the blocks were damaged. Krishnan held P.W. 1 responsible for the trouble. P.W. 1 protested against that and hot words were exchanged
