P.C. The Magistrate could not take cognizance under section 190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C. on the basis of protest petition and affidavits filed ... protest petition, which is possible only when the protest petition was ordered to be treated as a complaint. The record shows that neither protest petition
P.C. The Magistrate could not take cognizance under section 190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C. on the basis of protest petition and affidavits filed ... protest petition, which is possible only when the protest petition was ordered to be treated as a complaint. The record shows that neither protest petition
contemplated under sub-section (2) of Section 202 Cr.P.C.. Thereafter the protest petition dated 6th May, 2017 filed by the opposite party ... accused before taking cognizance under Section 190 (1) (a) Cr.P.C. on the protest petition filed against a final report. However, the Court need
property is pending between applicant and O.P. No. 2 and the O.P. No. 2 is trying to illegally took the possession ... witnesses under Sections 200 and 202 Cr.P.C the learned Magistrate treating the protest petition as a complaint proceeded to pass order summoning
P.C. The Magistrate could not take cognizance under section 190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C. on the basis of protest petition and affidavits filed ... protest petition, which is possible only when the protest petition was ordered to be treated as a complaint. The record shows that neither protest petition
aforementioned police report, first informant respondent 2 filed a protest petition. Concerned Magistrate allowed the protest petition and directed the investigating officer to conduct further ... report (final report) dated 24.6.2019 u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. A protest petition was again filed against aforesaid police report by first informant
P.W.-1, Rakesh Singh, First informant/opposite party-2, P.W.-2 Dr. Saumya Anand, the Doctor, who has examined the prosecutrix. P ... Investigating Officer, the credibility of testimony of P.W.-1, P.W.-2 and P.W.-3 could not be examined. It is, thus, urged
Chapter XII Cr.P.C . He examined the first informant Jay Dayal and the following witnesses under section 161 Cr.P.C. On the basis ... informant/opposite party-2 filed a protest petition dated 15.02.2021 against the summon. Concerned Magistrate treated the protest petition and the complaint and accordingly proceeded
light of the statements of P.W.1 and P.W.2 alone allowed the same, vide order dated 29.4.2022 and simultaneously the applicants were ... committed by court below in placing reliance upon testimonies of P.W.1 and P.W.2 as same fall in the realm of legal
property is pending between applicant and O.P. No. 2 and the O.P. No. 2 is trying to illegally took the possession ... P.C. on 22.10.2012 which was allowed, pursuant to which a FIR was lodged by the police against O.P. No. 2 and five others
