door should be opened. P.W. 2 opened the door of the Lodge followed by P.W. 1. As soon as P.W. 2 had opened ... alleged to have raped her in spite of her protests. P.W. 1 felt pain all over the body. It is said that while
P. One of the sons of Respondent-2 had burnt sugarcane
patties causing damage to the wheat crop of P, against which
P protested before ... Chand. His grievance was not
redressed. At about 6.00 P.M. Partap raised the protest
before Puran who also turned down the same. Shortly thereaf
protest petition and if there was
any substance in the protest petition then he
may took cognizance under Section 190(1)(b)
of Cr.P ... P.C.
The Magistrate could not take cognizance
under Section 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. on the basis
of protest petition and affidavits filed
investigation under Section 156 (3) of the Cr.P.C., is
accepted and protest petition thereto is rejected, the
Magistrate can still take cognizance upon ... P.C., and dismissed not at the stage of Section 203 ,
Cr.P.C., a second complaint or a second protest petition
would be maintainable
Sessions Court. The only witness that remained constant
throughout was P.W. I who is no other than the wife of the
deceased ... that the
assailant continued giving his blows in spite of protests of
P.W. 3. This argument proceeds upon the assumption that
Prosecution Witness
arrived there and he also
reprimanded P.W. 1 and questioned his authority. Even
though P.W. 1 asserted that authority was conferred upon ... from
the table but they were
425
given back on the protest of P.W. 1. P.W. 1 then assured him
that he would
held at 4.30 p.m.
The petitioner filed a protest at 4.15 p.m. stating
that the meeting had been adjourned by the Municipal
Commissioner ... leader of the Shiv Sena Party, filed a written protest
at 4.15 p.m. that the meeting had been adjourned by the
Municipal Commissioner
said plot two persons, Kesho Prasad (P.W. 3) and Sheo Lakhan Ahir (P.W. 2) to watch the crop sown by him. The respondent ... number of persons differently armed, came to the field and notwithstanding protests by P.W. 3 and his said companion, forcibly harvested the standing crop
dismissed the Protest Petition on the ground of bar of Section
195(1)(b)(ii) Cr.P.C. rather has after considering the
evidence ... rely on Section 195(1)(b)(ii)
Cr.P.C. for rejecting the Protest Petition of the appellant.
Thus, the submission on the basis
taken into
consideration not only the Protest Petition but
also the affidavit filed in support of the Protest
Petition as well as the four affidavits ... list of witnesses
as such in the Protest Petition. The prayer in
the Protest Petition is to set aside the final
report and to allow
