P.C. The Magistrate could not take cognizance under section 190 (1) (b) Cr.P.C. on the basis of protest petition and affidavits filed ... protest petition, which is possible only when the protest petition was ordered to be treated as a complaint. The record shows that neither protest petition
P.Nos.24990
and 24991 of 2017 : Mr.V.Karthik
Senior Counsel
for Mr.M.P.Jaya prakash
For Respondents
in Crl.O.P ... based on
the protest petition. The protest petition filed by the defacto complainant
treated as compliant. Only based on the above protest petition cognizance
false case. The contents of
complaint filed under Section 200 Cr.P.C., Protest Petition
and sworn statement filed by the 2nd respondent lacks ... complaint filed by the 2nd respondent under Section 200
Cr.P.C., Protest Petition and also sworn statement recorded
by the learned Magistrate.
14. Perusal
receipt of the same, the petitioner
filed a protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019 and also filed a private
complaint under ... P.C. The learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate dismissed the protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner
receipt of the same, the petitioner
filed a protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019 and also filed a private
complaint under ... P.C. The learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate dismissed the protest petition in C.M.P.No.337 of 2019.
Aggrieved over the same, the petitioner
engine of the train. These protesters had Congress Party flags and banners. These protesters were staging the protest under the leadership of Annu Tandon, appellant ... protest. He saw that some protesters were siting on the railway track and that is why the train was stopped.
10. P.W.-4, Srinivas
P.Deivasigamani
4.K.P.Nataraj
5.C.R.Anandakrishnan ... Respondents
Crl.O.P.No.21854 of 2021:
1.K.P.Ramasamy
2.K.P ... above docket order, dated 06.09.2021,
K.P.Ramasamy, K.P.Deivasigamani, K.P.Nataraj, Anandhakrishanan filed
Crl.O.P.No.21854 of 2021 are before
P.W.1 in the protest petition and Exs.P.1 to P.16 were
marked. The learned Magistrate vide order dated
11.06.2019 passed ... considering the sworn statement of PW.1
coupled with Exs.P.1 to P.16, this case is taken on file against
the accused
P.W.1 in the protest petition and Exs.P.1 to P.16 were
marked. The learned Magistrate vide order dated
11.06.2019 passed ... considering the sworn statement of PW.1
coupled with Exs.P.1 to P.16, this case is taken on file against
the accused
police
called P and released him after counselling him.
h. There was no change in P's behaviour and G
apprehended that he would ... first floor, where he lived (alongwith his parents).
On G protesting against P taking M upstairs, P threatened
her with eviction from the residence
