Ganga Sagar Chaubey, which has been
marked as Exhibit-6 (with protest). P.W.-11 has stated that the
seizure list of blood-soaked ... Sagar Chaubey and the same has been
marked as Exhibit-7 (with protest). In cross-examination, PW-
11 has stated that
P-2 dated 13.07.2016.
5. The petitioners being aggrieved have filed the present petition
under Section 482 Cr.P.C. laying challenge to protest petition ... Annexure P-3 passed in CWP-5688-2006, which was later on admitted vide
order Annexure P-4 dated 15.05.2008, in the protest petition Annexure
Ayana Charitable Trust (Formerly Known ... vs State Of Kerala, Represented By Its ... on 19 December
petitioner(s) and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey,
learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60841 ... complainant further alleged through
complaint that at around 8:00 P.M., the detained protesters
were brought before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Begusarai
revision under Section 397 of Cr.P.C., the
inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. cannot be invoked.
This Court, however, finds ... only on their application under Section 340 of Cr.P.C. and not on the
protest petition itself, which fact is duly recorded
petitioner(s) and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey,
learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60841 ... complainant further alleged through
complaint that at around 8:00 P.M., the detained protesters
were brought before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Begusarai
Criminal Procedure , 1973 (for short, 'the
Cr.P.C .'). Along with the protest petition, he filed
documents. The learned Magistrate after going through ... documents which are enclosed along with protest petition
i.e., Exs.P.1 to P.13, specifically held that there is a prima
face case
petitioner(s) and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey,
learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60841 ... complainant further alleged through
complaint that at around 8:00 P.M., the detained protesters
were brought before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Begusarai
P.C. The Magistrate could not take cognizance
under Section 190(1)(b) Cr.P.C. on the basis of protest petition and
affidavits filed ... Mohammad Yusuf vs.
State of U.P. 2017 SCC Online 1283 and submits that while
entertaining a protest petition the Magistrate should take
proceeded towards Dambaru (P.W.15) and
when raised the wooden plank to assault him, P.W.15 protested the
same. There was a tussle ... P.W.5, P.W.13 and
P.W.15, namely, Amuli Barik, Sulochana Pradhan and Dambaru Sahu
respectively. The assaults on Sulochana (P
