claim is based on tort there must be either direct or proximate cause for the damage to the property let out. He submits that ... plaintiff has not shown any direct or proximate cause showing the negligence of the defendant, as such, the defendant is not liable
they pass so that accidents may be avoided;
(3) that the proximate cause for the accident was the negligence of the bus driver ... said that the negligence of the Railway was not the proximate cause of the accident, for, it was the result of the negligence
employment and further that the cause should be a proximate cause and not a very remote cause. But at the same time if a workman
intention to cause death or an injury likely to cause death. In such cases, there may be either no intention to cause any injury ... that the rash or negligent act of the accused was the proximate cause which resulted in the death of the deceased. There must be direct
about 4 months before the occurrence which was the cause of annoyance to the accused. The factum of transfer of land Jamna in favour ... something might have occurred in the morning itself which was the proximate cause of the occurrence but the prosecution has suppressed that fact. There
respondent No. 1 and in view of this, there was no proximate cause for holding that the efficiency of respondent No. 1 was impaired
have avoided the accident. In other words, if the approximate (sic proximate?) cause of the injury is the negligence of both the plaintiff
that the workman's employment must be the distinctive and proximate cause of his personal injury and that the phrase does not mean only
negligent act of the accused was cause causans (immediate cause) and not causa sin qua non (cause of proximate cause. In other words, there must
there and if persons assembled on a busy road without any proximate cause or common object it cannot be said that they had formed unlawful
