case which reads as
under:-
"2. Meanwhile, Mr. PS Khare, learned proxy
counsel for the applicant draws attention to a
communication dated 15.09.2021 placed ... sought clarification on the claim of the
applicant form respondents No.2. Mr. PS
Khare, learned proxy counsel for the applicant
prays for disposal
submission
of the respondent in the form of proper rejoinder nor appeared
today, except a proxy counsel for the applicant, who is unable
to present
Expert, who opined that the handwriting/
signatures on the documents, namely, application form, OMR
sheet and document verification data, did not match with each
other ... applicant on the application form and other
documents did not match.
3. Heard Mr. Rajesh Chauhan, proxy counsel for Mr. Sachin
Chauhan, learned counsel
afforded any opportunity of being heard. In view of
this, learned proxy counsel for the applicant submits that it
is continuing cause of action ... four weeks'
time to file reply.
4. At this stage, learned proxy counsel for the applicant
submits that the applicant shall be satisfied
Learned proxy counsel for the respondent No.2 submits that this
case relates to not properly filling up a detailed Application Form on
online basis
entered in Board Certificate and as per that procedure, application form for examination used to be submitted by concerned school only ... previous classes/education done by the accused.
(c) The application form sent by the school to the UP Board was not taken in possession
Shri S.K.Gupta for Shri Rajender Khatter, counsel for respondents.
Learned proxy counsel for the respondents seeks short accommodation to advance his arguments, which ... birth, and the number of their working days etc., in a tabular form, for proper understanding of the case of the applicants
previous classes/education done by the accused.
(c) The application form sent by the school to the UP Board was not taken in possession ... learned counsel for the applicant and Shri N.K. Singh learned proxy counsel for the respondents. As admitted by both the counsel for the parties
Police,
IV Bn. DAP Delhi. Respondents.
(By Advocate Shri Nitesh Kr. Singh proxy for Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat)
O R D E R
M. Ramachandran, Vice ... Commissioner had advised him that on scrutiny of his application and attestation forms, the Screening Committee at Police Headquarters level had found
Delhi
(Then DCP/DE Cell, Delhi) Respondents.
(By Advocate Shri Chandramani Bhardwaj proxy for Mrs. Rashmi Chopra)
O R D E R
M. Ramachandran, Vice ... charges framed pertained to the same set of transactions. The respondents had formed an opinion that disciplinary proceedings were required to be initiated against them
