Search Results Page

Search Results

11 - 20 of 238 (0.23 seconds)

State vs . Govind @ Mutka on 4 August, 2022

buttondar Ex. P4. PW-1 was cross-examined by Ld. Proxy counsel for accused wherein inter alia he stated that there were no CCTV cameras ... accused was arrested. He further admitted that two mobile phone were recovered form the accused when IO has again checked the accused. He further stated
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ram Kishan on 30 May, 2014

camera proceedings, in presence of her mother Smt. Moni and Ms. Swapna, proxy counsel for Ms. Shashi Jaiswal, counsel for DCW. Certain preliminary questions were ... with his capacity and capability, his statement was recorded in question­answer form, without oath and in the relevant portion of his statement, the victim
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Sh. Manoj Kumar Singla vs State on 2 August, 2014

adjourned for 25.03.2014. On 25.03.2014, thought the complainant was present with proxy counsel but adjournment was again sought on the ground of non­ availability ... same has been filed just for the sake of filing in a form of luxurious litigation without having any sincere effort to take the same
Delhi District Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
Previous   1 2   3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next