Samir Kr. Roy & Ors vs Kanika Ghosh on 26 September, 2011
purpose of
preparation of the proxy vote from Utkal on the allegation that the
counting of proxy forms was wrong. It would be profitable
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 452 (0.62 seconds)In The Matter Of M/S. Reckitt Benckiser ... vs -- on 3 October, 2011
reservation that
the form of representation executed by the board of directors under seal
of company for appointment of proxy should have ... representation
is also untenable in law as it is not a proxy form, but a form of
representation as contemplated under Section
E.A.Benny vs The Assyrian Charities Kuries Limited on 14 July, 2011
Appellate
Court erred in not finding that
postal covers contained only
proxy forms and not notice, as
revealed from Exts.B7 series,
opened
Vasupujya vs Respondent(S) on 20 June, 2011
required under Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 with Proxy form
and Attendance Slip. The notice of the meeting was also advertised as
directed ... required under Section 393 of the Companies
Act, 1956 with Proxy form and Attendance Slip. The notice of the
meeting was also advertised as directed
Welspun vs Respondent(S) on 6 May, 2011
under Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the prescribed form
of proxy shall be sent by a pre-paid letter posted Under Certificate ... category,
present in person.
That voting by proxy is
permitted provided that the proxy in the prescribed form and duly
signed by the person entitled
Integra vs Respondent(S) on 11 November, 2011
under Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the
prescribed Form of Proxy shall be sent by a pre-paid letter posted
under Book ... person or
through proxy.
8.
That voting by proxy is permitted provided that the proxy in the
prescribed form and duly signed by the person
344/2011 on 4 April, 2011
pursuant to Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and a
form of Proxy can be obtained free of charge at the registered office ... present either personally or
by proxy.
Voting by proxy be permitted, provided that a proxy in the
prescribed form duly signed by the person
Arraycom vs Blank on 9 November, 2011
furnished pursuant to section 393 of the Companies
Act, 1956 and Form of Proxy can be obtained free of charge at the
Registered office ... present in person.
13. The
voting by proxy be permitted, provided that the proxy in the
prescribed form duly signed by the person entitled
Riddhi vs Blank on 30 June, 2011
under Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the prescribed Form
of Proxy shall be sent by a pre-paid letter posted under Book ... authorized representative or through
proxy.
[7] That
voting by proxy is permitted provided that the proxy in the
prescribed form and duly signed
Ajanta vs Respondent(S) on 25 August, 2011
under Section 393 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the prescribed Form
of Proxy shall be sent by a pre-paid letter posted under Book ... through proxy, for the meeting of the Unsecured
Creditors.
[8] That
voting by proxy is permitted provided that the proxy in the
prescribed form