Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 129 (0.72 seconds)

M/S Berger Paints India Ltd vs State on 17 May, 2022

appearance of complainant / consideration. On next date of hearing i.e 29.06.2016, proxy counsel for the complainant appeared and adjournment was sought ... Trial Court has to form the opinion that there is no sufficient ground for proceeding. In the present case, proxy counsel for the complainant
Delhi District Court Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ms. Jyotima Singh vs Ms. Reena on 3 February, 2022

amount of Rs. 5,50,000/- with the trial Court in the form of demand draft / pay order in the name of the complainant within ... 2019 03.02.2022 Present : Mr. Vimal Kumar, Advocate with the appellant. Mr. Rahul, Proxy Advocate for Ms. Meenu Chaudhary, Advocate with the respondent. Vide separate judgement
Delhi District Court Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Govind @ Mutka on 4 August, 2022

buttondar Ex. P4. PW-1 was cross-examined by Ld. Proxy counsel for accused wherein inter alia he stated that there were no CCTV cameras ... accused was arrested. He further admitted that two mobile phone were recovered form the accused when IO has again checked the accused. He further stated
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Kanwaljeet Kaur vs Kunal Sehgal Etc) on 18 May, 2022

Court had raised an objection regarding its maintainability in its present form, as an order declining the summoning of accused persons amounted to their acquittal ... said order of acquittal. 3. On the query raised by the Court, proxy Counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner had sought time to address
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next