2427/2015
26. The second affidavit filed on 21.07.2015 was in the form of an
affidavit from Shri Amit Yadav, a counsel associated with Shri ... give due/proper weightage to his submission on oath, in
the form of an affidavit.
27. A case of contempt arises only if there
harassment caused to the
applicant, he needs to be compensated in the form of cost
quantified at Rs.10,000/- which will be sufficient ... cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the applicant,
to which the learned proxy counsel for respondents appears
to have no objection.
2. In the second
ORAL)
Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents. Ms. Sushma, learned proxy counsel
for Mr. Hanu Bhasker, learned standing counsel, appears and accepts
notice ... Singh is stated to
have submitted his family details in Form No.3 on 14.09.2004 to
respondent No.2, in which the names
Delhi
Through its Chairman/
Managing Director. ... Respondent.
(By Avocate: Ms. Deepakashi, proxy for Mr. Ajesh Luthra)
ORDER (ORAL)
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that ... instant OA, with liberty to file a fresh one in a
modified form.
The OA is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(Dr. Brahm
Virender Pratap Singh vs M/O Railways on 4 March, 2016
Central Administrative Tribunal
Principal
Dr Monil Singhai vs M/O Health And Family Welfare on 23 February, 2016
CENTRAL
Ms Veenakothavale vs M/O Law And Justice And Company Affairs on 4 March, 2016
Deepak Kumar vs M/O Home Affairs on 2 August, 2016
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL
Ashok Kumar vs M/O Home Affairs on 2 August, 2016
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
PRINCIPAL
Rajendra vs Ministry Of Law & Justice on 15 February, 2016
OA 2553-14 1
