test identification
parade is a rule of prudence and not law. It simply acts as a
check valve to the evidence of identification in court
person with ordinary
prudence and judgment.
(a) The applicant should have ascertained the identity
of the persons by checking the voter id numbers,
which
check valve to the evidence of
identification in court of an accused by a witness and the same is a rule
of prudence
Mahmadhusen Abdulrahim Kalota Shaikh vs Union Of India & Ors on 21 October, 2008
Author
Laxman Padma Bhagal And Ors. vs The State on 22 December, 1964
Equivalent citations: AIR1965BOM195
lawyer are absent. If the Court does so as a mater of
prudence or indulgence, it is a different matter, but it is not
bound ... reasoning of the trial Court in the judgement, but
by cross-checking the reasoning with the evidence on record
with a view to satisfying itself
Sadhana Sharma vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy., Law ... on 11 January, 2012
check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
found to be truthful.
The courts as a matter of prudence look for corroboration to oral dying
declaration.
xiv) In K. Ramachandra Reddy v. Public ... cross-examination. The court has to ascertain
necessary measures to check the sanctity of the
statement made by the deceased. As in India
check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused
by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence