State vs 1 Rahul @ Chirmanti (A-1) on 30 November, 2015
test identification parade is a rule of prudence and not law. It simply
acts as a check valve to the evidence of identification in court
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 65 (1.20 seconds)State vs 1 Sheikh Mofizul (A-1), on 2 September, 2015
test identification parade is a rule of prudence and not law.
It simply acts as a check valve to the evidence of identification in court
Krishnat Madhukar Kadam vs State Of Kerala on 11 November, 2009
check valve to the evidence of
identification in Court of an accused by a witness and
the same is a rule of prudence
Nazim Khan Alias Guddu vs State on 8 May, 2014
check valve to the evidence of
identification in Court of an accused by a witness and the
same is a rule of prudence
Veer Bahadur Singh @ Veeru vs State on 18 March, 2015
check value to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused by a witness and the same is a
rule of prudence
Abrar S/O Sh. Babu vs State Nct Of Delhi on 7 May, 2015
other evidence. The
previous identification in the test identification parade is a check valve to the
evidence of identification in court of an accused ... 1610-2013 Page 8 of 17
rule of prudence and not law.
(f) In exceptional circumstances only, as discussed above, evidence of
identification
Bhura Singh vs State Of Haryana on 22 April, 2015
check valve to the evidence of
identification in Court of an accused by a witness
and the same is a rule of prudence
State vs 1 Dharmender @ Ajay, on 12 November, 2009
check
valve to the evidence of identification in
court of an accused by a witness and the
same is a rule of prudence
State vs . Ravi Ranjan on 22 February, 2020
check value to the evidence of
identification in court of an accused by a witness and
the same is a rule of prudence
State vs 1) Iqbal Ahmed @ Babloo on 10 October, 2019
check valve to the evidence of
identification in Court of an accused by a witness and the same
is a rule of prudence