Krishnat Madhukar Kadam vs State Of Kerala on 11 November, 2009
check valve to the evidence of
identification in Court of an accused by a witness and
the same is a rule of prudence
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36 (0.95 seconds)Saji S/O. Chellappan vs State Of Kerala To Be Rep.By Public on 11 April, 2007
check valve to the evidence of identification in
court of an accused by a witness and the same is a rule of prudence
Majhar Nashir Shaikh vs State Of Maharashtra on 6 May, 2016
check
value to the evidence of identification in court of an
accused by a witness and the same is a rule of
prudence
Rajesh Dhanaji Dhondi vs The State Of Maharashtra on 6 May, 2016
check
value to the evidence of identification in court of an
accused by a witness and the same is a rule of
prudence
Sartajkhan Mumtajkhan Pathan vs The State Of Maharashtra on 6 May, 2016
check
value to the evidence of identification in court of an
accused by a witness and the same is a rule of
prudence
Ramesh Shankar Kharwa vs The State Of Maharashtra on 6 May, 2016
check
value to the evidence of identification in court of an
accused by a witness and the same is a rule of
prudence
State vs . 1. Shyam Niwas S/O Suresh Kumar, R/O ... on 4 January, 2010
that testimony of police officials cannot be
relied upon. However, rule of prudence requires that their testimonies should
be scrutinized with great care. As stated ... room.
The accused had produced bags before the IO, who checked the same inside
the room itself, while keeping the same in the takht. Accused
Tanviben Pankajkumar Divetia vs State Of Gujarat on 6 May, 1997
Tanviben Pankajkumar Divetia vs State Of Gujarat on 6 May, 1997
Equivalent citations: AIR 1997
Pradeep Saini @ Anr. vs State on 9 September, 2009
Pradeep Saini @ Anr. vs State on 9 September, 2009
Author: Pradeep Nandrajog
Bench: Pradeep Nandrajog
Suryakant Dadasaheb Bitale vs Dilip Bajrang Kale & Anr on 2 July, 2014
Suryakant Dadasaheb Bitale vs Dilip Bajrang Kale & Anr on 2 July, 2014
Equivalent citations