Association for Democratic Reforms,[1] People's Union for Civil
Liberties (PUCL) & Another V. Union of India and Another [2], Notification
issued ... three-Judge
Bench in People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL ) (supra) posed the
following questions:-
"Should we not have such a situation
Civil Liberties and another v.
3
Union of India and another (PUCL) 1 . It does not lend any
support to the understanding of the Election ... appropriate court; that as per the pronouncement in PUCL‘s
case, there is no distinction between direct and indirect elections
and, hence, the provision
Association for Democratic Reforms,1
People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) & Another V.
Union of India and Another2, Notification issued by the
Election ... India. The three-Judge Bench in People’s
Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) (supra) posed the following
questions:-
“Should we not have such a situation
Subramanian Swamy vs Union Of India, Min. Of Law. on 13 May, 2016
Author: Dipak
Public Interest Foundation vs Union Of India on 25 September, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIR 2018
Indian Express Newspapers, Bombay Private
Limited and Others, (1988) 4 SCC 592, PUCL versus Union
of India, AIR 2004 SC 1442, Union of India versus
decision rendered in the case of Peoples Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) v. Union of India and Anr. , wherein the Apex Court expressed the view
been made to the orders passed by the Apex Court in PUCL
v. Union of India WP (C) No.196/2001 about the various directions
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248, PUCL v. Union of
India and other, (1997) 3 SCC 433 and Kapila Hingorani
meaning of Article 21 of the Constitution. In the case of PUCL v. Union of India , 2000 (5) SCALE the Supreme Court has held that
