District Patiala.
Respondent No.1/Complainant
2. Punjab State Urban Development Authority (PUDA) through its Chief
Administrator, Chandigarh (Notice not issued)
3. Punjab State Urban ... Development Authority (PUDA) through
Licensing Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector 32, Mohali, Chandigarh
(Notice not issued)
4. Alka Garg Wife of Rishi Pal son of Banarsi
Naresh Kumar Son Of Shri Deendayal vs Chief Administrator, Puda, Mohali. on 2 February, 2015
2nd Additional Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
DAKSHIN ... Golden Avenue, Phase I, Garha Road,
Jalandhar.
.....Complainants
Versus
1. Chief Administrator, PUDA, Mohali.
2. Estate Officer, PUDA, Jalandhar.
.....Opposite Parties
Consumer Complaint under
Company was not able to get the land allotted to them by PUDA on account of outstanding dues required to be deposited ... 2009-ST-II/8674 dated 16.11.2009. Original allottee of PUDA and re-allottees along with their legal heirs were allowed to be charged at original
Sarabjit Singh vs Estate Officer Puda on 10 September, 2015
2nd Additional Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH ... Versus
1. The Estate Officer, Punjab Urban Development Authority, having
office at PUDA Complex, Near Rajguru Nagar, Ferozepur Road,
Ludhiana
estimate cost was Rs. 7,14,6000/-. As per PAPRA, the
PUDA had got deposited 25% of the estimated costs of development works ... already deposited
external development charges (EDC) as per the schedule of PUDA and then it was
the duty of PUDA to get work done outside
Puda vs Sham Lal Gamber & Ors. on 13 July, 2015
2nd Additional Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR ... Date of Decision: 13.7.2015
Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority (now BDA), PUDA
Complex, Bhagu Road, Bathinda through its Estate Officer.
Appellant
Naresh Kumar vs Puda on 2 February, 2015
Daily Order
2nd Additional Bench
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB
DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH ... Golden Avenue, Phase I, Garha Road, Jalandhar.
.....Complainants
Versus
Chief Administrator, PUDA, Mohali.
Estate Officer, PUDA, Jalandhar.
.....Opposite Parties
Consumer Complaint under the Consumer Protection
Madhya Marg, Chandigarh.
Government of Punjab through Chief Administrator, GMADA, PUDA Bhawan, Phase 8, Mohali.
...... Opposite Parties
BEFORE: JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT ... demonstrated that the project was being developed on the guidelines of PUDA/GMADA (3) under a legal Agreement made by the Opposite Party
averments that Gurmail Singh OP no.3
applied for a plot to PUDA by getting loan of Rs.2,40,000/- from
State Bank ... cancel the plot before draw.
The plot application was cancelled by PUDA and the amount of
Rs.2,40,000/- was deposited in personal saving
required from him to take the necessary permission from the PUDA. No such certificate has been taken by the complainant. That complainant has neither submitted ... premises of the complainant falls within the area of schedule road of PUDA, then enhancement in the load could not be permitted without the necessary
