petitioner submits that
now, the Punjab Urban Development Authority (for short `PUDA')
has framed a policy for compounding. Learned senior counsel for
the petitioner ... permitted to
withdraw the petition to enable it to move the PUDA for
compounding of the offence in question .
Dismissed as withdrawn.
In case
same was re-allotted in their favour vide memo
no.PUDA-EO/2001/7982 dated 06.11.2001 and after completing the
formalities of the transfer vide ... compounding fee from the person, who compromised with
PUDA and Rs.12,148/- as non construction fee from the original
allottee/person. The information provided
yard to the Additional Chief Administrator, PUDA, SAS Nagar,
Mohali vide letter dated 3.9.1997. It was received in the office of the respondents ... written letter dated 15.1.1998
to the Additional Chief Administrator, PUDA, SAS Nagar, Mohali informing him
that the appellant had failed to appear before the Scrutiny
District Ropar
through its Additional Chief Administrator.
2. Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA) through its Estate Officer.
3. Punjab Urban Development Authority (PUDA), Chandigarh through ... respondents also filed the affidavit of Darshan Singh,
Estate Officer, PUDA as Ex.R-1. They also proved documents
1152 of 2006 3
Petition No.13648 and the appeal preferred by PUDA against the said order
was dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme ... said rule and notification were held to be
void and PUDA was directed to charge the extension fee as per the
unamended Rule
Institution: 09.10.2006.
Date of Decision: 30.05.2011.
Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Jagraon Road,
Ludhiana, through Addl. Chief Administrator, PUDA, Ludhiana.
.....Appellant.
Versus ... from 1995 onwards at the rates specified in Rule 13 of the PUDA
Rules, 1995 and not at higher rates fixed by the appellant vide
Sector-65, SAS
Nagar, Mohali.
.....Appellant.
Versus
1. Estate Office, GAMADA, PUDA Bhawan, Sector-62, SAS Nagar,
Mohali.
2. Chief Administrator, GAMADA, PUDA Bhawan, Sector ... letter Ex.C30 produced
by the appellant, he visited the PUDA office, Mohali on 28.12.2005 for taking
possession, but the case file
Institution: 08.03.2010.
Date of Decision: 29.04.2011.
The Greater Mohali Area Authority, PUDA Bhawan, Sector-62, SAS Nagar,
Mohali, through its Chief Administrator.
.....Appellant.
Versus
Jones ... after about four
years of the allotment i.e. on 20.04.1999. PUDA after obtaining four annual
installments of the plot @ Rs.70,000/- along with
Sunil Garg aged 27 years, R/o HIG-33, Sector 48 C, PUDA presently working as Lecturer in Environment Science.
112. Sunita Kumari
cooperate with the plaintiff-respondent for getting
necessary clearance certificates from PUDA and Income Tax Authorities
for the purpose of execution and registration of sale
