prove his bonafides which is
incumbent when a purchaser sets up a defense of
being a bonafide purchaser for value without notice ... transferred
that property to a third party, i.e. defendant No.2,
he must be considered to be a bonafide purchaser of
the suit
proved that the third Defendant was a bonafide purchaser.
24. According to the learned Judge, the Defendant No.4
had not specifically stated that ... could have resided in a different accommodation
that does not mean that he was not a bonafide purchaser
proved that the third Defendant was a bonafide purchaser.
24. According to the learned Judge, the Defendant No.4
had not specifically stated that ... could have resided in a different accommodation
that does not mean that he was not a bonafide purchaser
proved that the third Defendant was a bonafide purchaser.
24. According to the learned Judge, the Defendant No.4
had not specifically stated that ... could have resided in a different accommodation
that does not mean that he was not a bonafide purchaser
defendant purchased an extent of 80 sq.ft.
for a valid consideration, wherein, he is running a tea stall. The purchasers
have also ... encumbrance. So, as a bonafide purchasers, they have purchased the
property from the defendant Murugan for a valid consideration.
4. Both parties have
trial
Court came to a wrong conclusion that the 8th defendant is not a bonafide
purchaser and that he would further contend that ... view that Ex.B.36 is
not a genuine document and 8th defendant is not a bonafide purchaser of the
property covered under
replied stating
that there is already a sale deed in his favor and he is a
bonafide purchaser. The decisions placed reliance ... allows the specific performance against the subsequent
purchaser, if the subsequent purchaser is a bonafide
purchaser for value without notice
trial
Court came to a wrong conclusion that the 8th defendant is not a bonafide
purchaser and that he would further contend that ... view that Ex.B.36 is
not a genuine document and 8th defendant is not a bonafide purchaser of the
property covered under
trial
Court came to a wrong conclusion that the 8th defendant is not a bonafide
purchaser and that he would further contend that ... view that Ex.B.36 is
not a genuine document and 8th defendant is not a bonafide purchaser of the
property covered under
trial
Court came to a wrong conclusion that the 8th defendant is not a bonafide
purchaser and that he would further contend that ... view that Ex.B.36 is
not a genuine document and 8th defendant is not a bonafide purchaser of the
property covered under
