action in accordance with the law for
commission of the offence of purgery.
4. The plaintiff filed the replication to the Written Statement ... false statement and therefore,
she is liable for punishment for committing purgery.
It is claimed that:-
In her cross examination on 17.08.2004, the
plaintiff denied
except the gravity of the offence in respect of which fabrication/purgery is committed.
It is contended that if a complainant has lead false evidence
relating to the same allegation i.e. cheating, forgery, fraud and purgery etc. On account of the said cases the Gangster Act was also imposed
been made by the applicant for
prosecuting the non applicant for purgery and other related offences against justice
allegedly committed by the non applicant before
fictitious document, for which the appellant needs to be prosecuted for purgery. The circumstances as tabulated by the trial judge, being the suspicious circumstances
prosecution PW. 9
being turned ostile has sought for initiation of purgery u/sec. 193 of
Cr.P.C.
37. Further the prosecution has examined
prosecution PW. 9
being turned ostile has sought for initiation of purgery u/sec. 193 of
Cr.P.C.
37. Further the prosecution has examined
