stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay14 . It is as follows ... 55299/2013
58. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified in initiating
proceedings for short levy after the expiry
stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay9 . It is as follows ... penalty
equivalent to the duty specified in the notice."
39. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood
when the Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in
Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. v/s Commissioner of Central
Excise, Bombay9 . The provisions ... penalty equivalent to the duty specified
in the notice."
55. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co., the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay10 . It is as follows ... penalty equivalent to the duty specified in the
notice."
26. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the
Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam
Pharmaceutical Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Bombay9 . It is as follows ... penalty equivalent to
the duty specified in the notice."
35. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the
Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam
Pharmaceutical Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Bombay7 . It is as follows ... penalty equivalent to
the duty specified in the notice."
35. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the
Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam
Pharmaceutical Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Bombay6 . It is as follows ... penalty equivalent to
the duty specified in the notice."
22. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay ... penalty equivalent to the duty
specified in the notice."
26. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
70377/2018
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay4 and which has been
reproduced ... penalty equivalent to the duty specified
in the notice."
15. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co. the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the
Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam
12 ST/51858/2021
Pharmaceutical Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Bombay3 ... penalty equivalent to
the duty specified in the notice."
26. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
