stood when the Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam
12
ST/10583/2023-DB
Pharmaceutical Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise ... penalty equivalent to the duty specified
in the notice."
26. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court examined whether the
Department was justified
Pushpam Steels vs Cc Sea Ch - Ii on 13 June, 2019
IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,
SOUTH ZONAL BENCH, CHENNAI ... 40094/2019 in C/42296/2018
M/s. PUSHPAM STEELS APPELLANT
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (SEA), CHENNAI - II RESPONDENT
Date of hearing /decision 13.06.2019
Appearance
applicability of the proviso.
13. This Court, in Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company v.
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay - 1995 Supp ... ground for invoking the proviso to section 11A.
25. In case of Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company
stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay14 . It is as follows ... 55299/2013
58. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified in initiating
proceedings for short levy after the expiry
stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay9 . It is as follows ... penalty
equivalent to the duty specified in the notice."
39. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood
when the Supreme Court explained "suppression of facts" in
Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. v/s Commissioner of Central
Excise, Bombay9 . The provisions ... penalty equivalent to the duty specified
in the notice."
55. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co., the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
applicability of the proviso.
13. This Court, in Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company v.
Collector of Central Excise, Bombay - 1995 Supp ... ground
for invoking the proviso to section 11A.
25. In case of Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company
stood when the Supreme Court
explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. vs.
Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay2 . It is as follows ... 53712/2018
27. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified in initiating
proceedings for short levy after the expiry
stood when the Supreme
Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical
Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay3 . It is as follows ... penalty equivalent to the duty
specified in the notice."
18. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
stood when the Supreme
Court explained "suppression of facts" in Pushpam Pharmaceutical
Co. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Bombay3 . It is as follows ... penalty equivalent to the duty
specified in the notice."
14. In Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Company, the Supreme Court
examined whether the Department was justified
