Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Pushpam International (P) Ltd. vs All Indian General Mazdoor on 6 January, 2003 Equivalent citations: 104(2003)DLT425, 2003(67)DRJ686, (2003)IILLJ797DEL

relevant to also refer to the decision of the Supreme Court in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. v. CCE1 which was rendered in the context of Section ... CCE2 the Supreme Court referred to its earlier decision in Pushpam Pharmaceutical Co. v. 1 1995 Supp

Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior Advocate with Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Shaurya Pushpam, Advocates for D- 1 [M: 9810035336 Email: [email protected]] Mr. Jayant Mehta ... Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Hemant Chaudhri and Mr. Shaurya Pushpam, Advocates for D-2. Mr. Tanmaya Mehta and Mr. Vinayak Thakur, Advocates

wife was the proprietor of a firm by name M/s. Pushpam Investment Company in whose name an account had been opened ... Delhi. His wife Pushpa Verma was the proprietor of M/s. Pushpam investment company which had opened an account in the same bank

DELHI + W.P.(C) 10335/2025 PREMA KUMARI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shaurya Pushpam, Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Mr. Ankur Apurv Singh and Mr. Prakhar Aditya, Advs ... means of the present writ petition. 10. We have heard Mr. Shaurya Pushpam, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Suruchi Mittal, learned

Krishnan V., Advs. for R-1 Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Pushpam Jha, Mr. Nitin Sharma, Ms. Shilpa Gupta, Ms. Deepika Pokharia and Ms. Deepti Sarin ... Advs. for R-1 Signature Not Verified Mr. Saikrishna Rajagopal, Mr. Pushpam Jha, Signed By:HARIOMW.P.(C)-IPD 33/2023 & cont. matters Page

relevant paragraphs are excerpted below: "13. This Court, in Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co. v. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay [1995 Supp (3) SCC 462], while ... ground for invoking the proviso to Section 11A . 25. In case of Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co. v. C.C.E. [1995 (78) ELT 401 (SC)], this

person to fill a vacancy" 36. In Revenue Divisional Officer v. Pushpam & Ors. , AIR 1976 Madras 252, the learned Chief Justice, while considering

evolve a correct or at least a satisfactory solution- see R. Pushpam v. State of Madras ( Air 1953 Mad. 292). This meaning was approved

decision in Nizam Sugar Factory (supra) applies. The decisions in Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co v. CCE 1995 Supp (3) SCC 462, Gujarat Ambuja Exports Limited