dispute with Anil Kumar Dutta about the appointment of the Ld. Arbitrator. The Arbitrator
should be appointed or nominated as agreed by all the parties ... named Arbitrator. The aforesaid argument appears to be an argument in desperation. No
Arbitrator has been named in the agreement. The Arbitrator was preferably
sent a reply dated 13.09.2013 calling for details of the qualification of the Arbitrator, which was furnished by the first respondent vide letter dated ... nominee Arbitrator of the first respondent, namely, Shri.A.Jagannathan and Shri.G.Sivakumar, as the nominee Arbitrator of the appellant. The Presiding Arbitrator would
Director
of the 1st respondent does not possess requisite qualification to
act as an arbitrator and conduct the proceedings in an
unbiased manner ... other contention urged is with regard to the
qualification of the arbitrator and the alleged bias he may
entertain having regard to his position
Dalbir Singh vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 1 July, 2015
Author: Amol Rattan
while appointing an arbitrator is required to have due
regard to the qualifications required of the arbitrator in the agreement between the
parties, as also ... Applicant is entitled. To
decide such grievances, no special qualification is required of an Arbitrator. In fact,
it would be fit and proper to appoint
arbitrator
and called upon the respondents to nominate an arbitrator. Under the
arbitration agreement, if one of the parties fails to appoint an arbitrator
within ... chandigarh
ARB-192-2014 (O&M) 2
arbitrator. The arbitrators must possess minimum educational qualification
of degree in Civil Engineering. However, the respondents have
arbitration with a sole arbitrator, if
the parties fail to agree on the arbitrator within thirty
days from receipt of a request by one party ... appointing an arbitrator, shall
have due regard to -
(a) any qualification required for the arbitrator
by the agreement of the parties, and
(b) other considerations
rights of a party under the agreement to appoint its arbitrator once the proceedings under Section 11(6) of the Act had commenced came ... arbitration agreement was to specifically provide for any particular qualification(s) of an arbitrator the same would not denude the power of the Court acting
appointed any new presiding arbitrator though the presiding
arbitrator is transferred, the respondent has lost their right to appoint any
arbitrator in accordance with ... arbitration agreement was to specifically provide
for any particular qualification of an arbitrator, the same would not
denude power of the court acting under Section
Chief Justice under Section 11(6) , party
having right to appoint arbitrator under arbitral agreement loses
the right ... emphasis has been given that while
appointing the arbitrator it has to be seen the qualification and
impartiality. It will be relevant to quote paragraph
