Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 1139 (0.91 seconds)

Balammal vs Palandi Naidu And Ors. on 7 September, 1937

event, on account of a defeasible immunity or qualified privilege attaching to the alleged defamation by reason of the occasion of the publication by first ... occasions as privileged conferring immunity from liability to an action either absolutely or conditionally, and commonly known as absolute privilege and qualified privilege. Where
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Potaraju Venkata Reddy vs Emperor on 15 March, 1912

matter of negative inference. Mr. Rosario argued that only a qualified privilege existed in connection with the occasion of judicial proceedings and that the plea ... illustrations in Section. 499 some reference to a case of qualified privilege in connection with a statement made in the course of judicial proceedings
Madras High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 11 - Full Document

Dhandapani(Died) vs Balaji on 25 March, 2026

grievance, such communication is protected under the doctrine of qualified privilege. Therefore, a litigant who approaches a judicial or quasi-judicial authority with a complaint ... malice, which is an essential requirement for denying the protection of qualified privilege. 29.On behalf of the plaintiff/respondent, reliance was placed
Madras High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

In Re: P. Venkata Reddy vs Unknown on 15 March, 1911

matter of negative inference, Mr. Rozario argued that only a qualified privilege existed in connection with the occasion of judicial proceedings and that the plea ... illustrations in Section 499 some reference to a case of qualified privilege in connection with a statement made in the course of judicial proceedings
Madras High Court Cites 14 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next